The meaning of life
One of these afternoons, I was having a morning tea, slash jewelry exhibition, with the wives of ambassadors to Malaysia in a private club. It made me feel very good – not the fact that I was hanging out in a fancy place with very important ladies, but the realization how much I appreciate my own experiences and how easy it is to waste life even, or perhaps especially, if you have everything you may ever want.
If you think it is a big stress to hang out in high society, you are wrong. All you need to do is shut up and have fun listening to the useless chit-chat. I tried having (meaningful) conversations with a few ladies, but after meeting blank looks of misapprehension, I downgraded my language to “it is so nice” and “how interesting” and shifted my full attention to munching Iraqi delicacies.
Considering that the group was predominantly from Arab countries, I was excited to hear discussion about the war in Iraq. The conversation was soon started to my delight, and finished within 5 minutes to my great dismay. There was just nothing more to be said. In fact, there was no argument – every indignant comment was backed by agreeing nods and left as it was without further elaboration. I could go on saying that the causality of argumentation was flawed and conclusions were illogical, but what is the point of giving serious criticism to a conversation, which I could not help comparing to the one you hear among preschoolers when they throw out arguments overheard from their parents.
At this point, I realized that I should better not try to challenge any views. I generally don’t like discussing politics with non-professionals, and especially at social events. Such discussions are usually overridden by speculative theories and conspiracies, and I prefer a little more structured and academic view of the world events. But in the case of my very important ladies, their conspiracies and speculations were, besides being ungrounded, also delivered in such a primitive manner, that I thought it better if I held my tongue.
After one of the ladies declared, with a thick air of sensation, that Americans started the war because of oil, another lady added that they also wanted to pave the way for Israel to the Middle East. Then, the Americans were blamed for destroying museums, libraries and the whole ancient civilization of Iraq. The exact term ‘weapons of mass destruction’ got stuck on one lady's tongue on the word 'weapons', but she was saved by a friend who declared that there was no order in Iraq and that was why the criminals from neighboring countries were coming there and creating all the mess (together with Americans). And the discussion was concluded with the logical “it is all because there is no order, no leader – Iraq needs a leader!” Let me now guess the name of a possible candidate for the good leader.
This brief sidekick to politics was the brightest highlight of the event. Conversation then shifted to the same old topics – jewelry, children, presents, travel. But to give the full credit to these conversations, I must say that none of them lasted beyond 5 sentences.
- Have you been to place A?
- It is so nice, isn’t it? Place B is nice too. You haven’t been there?
- I have been to place C. Isn’t it nice?
Conversations about children were more like forced monologues due to the absence of genuinely interested listeners. Only discussions about jewelry caused general elevation.
By the end of the tea-drinking, I caught myself wondering how such narrow-mindedness was even possible. It must take a very determined effort to prevent oneself from growing mentally if you have all the opportunities and doors open to you, and you insist on not wanting to know anything beyond your wardrobe and jewelry box.
If you think it is a big stress to hang out in high society, you are wrong. All you need to do is shut up and have fun listening to the useless chit-chat. I tried having (meaningful) conversations with a few ladies, but after meeting blank looks of misapprehension, I downgraded my language to “it is so nice” and “how interesting” and shifted my full attention to munching Iraqi delicacies.
Considering that the group was predominantly from Arab countries, I was excited to hear discussion about the war in Iraq. The conversation was soon started to my delight, and finished within 5 minutes to my great dismay. There was just nothing more to be said. In fact, there was no argument – every indignant comment was backed by agreeing nods and left as it was without further elaboration. I could go on saying that the causality of argumentation was flawed and conclusions were illogical, but what is the point of giving serious criticism to a conversation, which I could not help comparing to the one you hear among preschoolers when they throw out arguments overheard from their parents.
At this point, I realized that I should better not try to challenge any views. I generally don’t like discussing politics with non-professionals, and especially at social events. Such discussions are usually overridden by speculative theories and conspiracies, and I prefer a little more structured and academic view of the world events. But in the case of my very important ladies, their conspiracies and speculations were, besides being ungrounded, also delivered in such a primitive manner, that I thought it better if I held my tongue.
After one of the ladies declared, with a thick air of sensation, that Americans started the war because of oil, another lady added that they also wanted to pave the way for Israel to the Middle East. Then, the Americans were blamed for destroying museums, libraries and the whole ancient civilization of Iraq. The exact term ‘weapons of mass destruction’ got stuck on one lady's tongue on the word 'weapons', but she was saved by a friend who declared that there was no order in Iraq and that was why the criminals from neighboring countries were coming there and creating all the mess (together with Americans). And the discussion was concluded with the logical “it is all because there is no order, no leader – Iraq needs a leader!” Let me now guess the name of a possible candidate for the good leader.
This brief sidekick to politics was the brightest highlight of the event. Conversation then shifted to the same old topics – jewelry, children, presents, travel. But to give the full credit to these conversations, I must say that none of them lasted beyond 5 sentences.
- Have you been to place A?
- It is so nice, isn’t it? Place B is nice too. You haven’t been there?
- I have been to place C. Isn’t it nice?
Conversations about children were more like forced monologues due to the absence of genuinely interested listeners. Only discussions about jewelry caused general elevation.
By the end of the tea-drinking, I caught myself wondering how such narrow-mindedness was even possible. It must take a very determined effort to prevent oneself from growing mentally if you have all the opportunities and doors open to you, and you insist on not wanting to know anything beyond your wardrobe and jewelry box.



1 Comments:
Wow - kudos for lasting that long with the ladies (and not errupting in political outburst).
You write really well - it's as if we were sitting there with you (with gnashing teeth!).
Post a Comment
<< Home